Peran Nature Connected Terhadap Perilaku Pro Lingkungan
Abstract
Abstrak. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh nature connected terhadap perilaku pro lingkungan dengan sampel karyawan. Perkembangan populasi yang semakin cepat, daya dukung alam untuk menopang kehidupan manusia dirasakan mulai berpengaruh, terutama di kota besar. Air bersih yang sulit diperoleh, polusi udara yang menyebabkan perubahan cuaca secara drastic, anomaly cuaca dan sebagainya. Akibat kerusakan hutan, mulai dirasakan dampaknya bagi manusia, hampir diseluruh belahan dunia. Keterhubungan dengan alam merupakan fondasi penting dari sikap lingkungan seseorang, dan bersifat laten dan relatif stabil sepanjang waktu dan situasi. Sample penelitian ini berjumlah 39 orang yang berprofesi sebagai karyawan tetap / tidak tetap pada berbagai instansi/perusahaan. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan tidak adanya pengaruh nature connected terhadap perilaku pro lingkungan. Berdasarkan hasil uji analisis rgresi linier maka nilai koefesien regresi bernilai negative (-0,75). Dengan demikian dapat dikatakan bahwa perilaku Nature Connected (X) berpengaruh negative terhadap Perilaku Pro Lingkungan (Y) dengan persamaan regresinya yaitu Y = 82,519 + (-0,75) X. Dengan nilai signifikansi (sig.) sebesar 0,684 ≥ p = 0,05. Sehingga, dapat disimpulkan bahwa hipotesis yang mengatakan “ada pengaruh perilaku nature connected terhadap Perilaku Pro Lingkungan†ditolak.
Abstrac. This study aims to determine the effect of nature connected on pro-environmental behavior with a sample of employees. With the rapid development of population, the carrying capacity of nature to sustain human life is felt to have an effect, especially in big cities. Clean water that is difficult to obtain, air pollution that causes drastic changes in weather, weather anomalies and so on. As a result of forest destruction, the impact on humans is starting to be felt, in almost all parts of the world. Connectedness with nature is an important foundation of one's environmental attitudes, and is latent and relatively stable over time and situations. The sample of this research is 39 people who work as permanent/non-permanent employees at various agencies/companies. The results of this study indicate that there is no effect of nature connected on pro-environmental behavior. Based on the results of the linear regression analysis test, the value of the regression coefficient is negative (-0.75). Thus it can be said that Nature Connected behavior (X) has a negative effect on Pro-Environmental Behavior (Y) with the regression equation Y = 82.519 + (-0.75) X. With a significance value (sig.) of 0.684 ≥ p = 0, 05. Thus, it can be concluded that the hypothesis which says "there is an effect of nature connected behavior on pro- environmental behavior" is rejected.
References
Andrea Faber Taylor and Frances E. Kuo. (2009). Children With Attention Deficits Concentrate Better After Work in the Park http://jad.sagepub.com/cgi/content/ab stract/12/5/402
Azwar, S. (2013). Sikap Manusia: Teori dan Pengukurannya. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
Bratman, G.N., Hamilton, J.P. and Daily, G.C. (2012), The impacts of nature experience on human cognitive function and mental health. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1249: 118-136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06400.x
Citra Febriyanti. (2016). Pengembangan skala pengukuran perilaku pro lingkungan: general ecological behavior (geb) scale, JP3I Vol. V No. 2 April 2016.
Collado, S., Rosa, C.D., Corraliza, J.A., (2020). The effect of a nature-based environmental education program on children’s environmental attitudes and behaviors: a randomized experiment with primary schools. Sustainability 12 (17). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12176817
De Groot, J.I.M., & Steg, L. (2009). Mean or green: Which value can promote stable environmental behavior?. Conservation Letters 2, 61-66.
Dhiya Hillman Fadzil. (2021). Determinants of pro-environmental behaviour among students, , University. Malaysia Terengganu Journal of Undergraduate Research. Volume 3 Number 2, April 2021: 89-98.
Geng L, Xu J, Ye L, Zhou W, Zhou K (2015) Connections with Nature and Environmental Behaviors. PLoS ONE 10(5): e0127247. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127247
Ghozali, Imam. (2013). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program SPSS. Edisi Ketujuh. Semarang: Badan Penerbit universitas Diponegoro.
Hartig, T., G. Evans, L. Jamner,et al. (2003). Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings. J. Environ. Psychol 23: 109–123.
Howell AJ, et al. (2011) Nature connectedness: Associations with well-being and mindfulness. Pers Individ Dif. 51: 166–171.
https://batukota.bps.go.id/statictable/2022/03/23/ 1235/jumlah-pengunjung-objek-wisata-dan-wisata-oleh-oleh-menurut-tempat-wisata-di-kota-batu-2020.html
Jessica L. Kirk. (2010). Sustainable Environments and Pro- Environmental Behavior, Interior Design Program: University of Nebraska-Lincoln. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/arch_id_theses/2. Diakses pada: Januari 2023
Kaiser, F. G., Oerke, B., & Bogner, F. X. (2007). Behavior-based environmental attitude: Development of an instrument for adolescents. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(3), 242–251. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.06.004
Kaplan, R. & S. Kaplan. (1989). The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. Manuscript, University of Nevada, Reno. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. 20.
Kaplan, S. (1983). A Model of Person-Environment Compatibility. Environment and Behavior, 15(3), 311–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916583153003
Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401
Laila Maharani. (2017). Dukungan Ekologi Berbasis Perkembangan Sosial untuk MeningkatkanKemampuan Keterampilan Sosial Anak. Konseli (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling), 04 (2); 115-126
Martin, L., White, M. P., Hunt, A., Richardson, M., Pahl, S., & Burt, J. (2020). Nature contact, nature connectedness and associations with health, wellbeing and pro- environmental behaviours. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 68, 101389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020. 101389
Mayer FS, Frantz CM, Bruehlman-Senecal E, Dolliver K. (2009). Why is nature beneficial? The role of connectedness to nature. Environ Behaviour. 41: 607–643.
Mayer FS, Frantz CM. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. J Environ Psychol. 24: 503–515. 19.
Mohamad Muslim, H. F., Tetsuro, H., Shinya, N., & Yahya, N. A. (2018). Nature experience promotes preference for and willingness to coexist with wild animals among urban and suburban residents in Malaysia. Ecological Processes, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-018-0127-7
Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M., & Murphy, S. A. (2009). The Nature Relatedness scale: Linking individuals' connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environment and Behavior, 41(5), 715–740. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916508318748
Perrin, J. L., & Benassi, V. A. (2009). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of emotional connection to nature? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(4), 434–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.03.003
Louv, Richard. (2010). Do Our Kids Have Nature- Deficit Disorder ?. Volume 67, Number 4 Health and Learning Pages 24-30
Roe, J., & Aspinall, P. (2011). The restorative outcomes of forest school and conventional school in young people with good and poor behaviour. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 10(3), 205–212. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2011.03.003
Schultz, P. W. (2000). Empathizing with nature: The effects of perspective taking on concern for environmental issues. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 391–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00174
Schultz PW. (2002). Inclusion with nature: Understanding the psychology of human-nature interactions. In: Schmuck P, Schultz PW, editors. The psychology of sustainable development. New York: Kluwer; pp. 61–78. 8.
Schultz, P. W., Bator, R. J., Large, L. B., Bruni, C. M., & Tabanico, J. J. (2013). Littering in Context: Personal and Environmental Predictors of Littering Behavior. Environment and Behavior, 45(1), 35–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916511412179
Schultz, P. W., Shriver, C., Tabanico, J. J., & Khazian, A. M. (2004). Implicit connections with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00022-7
Schultz, P. W., & Tabanico, J. (2007). Self, identity, and the natural environment: Exploring implicit connections with nature. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(6), 1219–1247. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00210.x
Schultz, P. W., Bator, R. J., Large, L. B., Bruni, C. M., & Tabanico, J. J. (2013). Littering in Context: Personal and Environmental Predictors of Littering Behavior. Environment and Behavior, 45(1), 35–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916511412179
Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3), 309–317. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004
Stern, P.C. (2000), New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56: 407-424. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175
Torkar, G., Mohar, P., Gregorc, T., Nekrep, I., & Adamič, M. (2010). The conservation knowledge and attitudes of teenagers in Slovenia toward the Eurasian Otter. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 5, 341–352.
Ulrich, R. S. (1986). Human responses to vegetation and landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 13, 29–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(86)90005-8
Winarsunu, Tulus. (2015). Statistik Dalam Penelitian Psikologi dan Pendidikan. Malang: UMM Press
Xu, J., & Aiwu, J. (2022). Effects of nature contact on children’s willingness to conserve animals under rapid urbanization. Global Ecology and Conservation, 38, e02278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2022.e02278
Open Access
Journal of Psikovidya (Jurnal Psikovidya) is a national peer-reviewed and open access journal that publishes significant and important research from all areas of psychology.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content that making research published in this journal freely available to the public that supports a greater exchange of knowledge.
Copyright
Submission of a manuscript implies that the submitted work has not been published before (except as part of a thesis or report, or abstract); that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere; that its publication has been approved by all co-authors. If and when the manuscript is accepted for publication, the author(s) still hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions. Authors or others are allowed to multiply articles as long as not for commercial purposes. For the new invention, authors are suggested to manage its patent before published. The license type is CC-BY-SA 4.0.
Disclaimer
No responsibility is assumed by publisher and co-publishers, nor by the editors for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a result of any actual or alleged libelous statements, infringement of intellectual property or privacy rights, or products liability, whether resulting from negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any ideas, instructions, procedures, products or methods contained in the material therein.
